Primative Polytopes and Tropical Relations

By trdunlap2

My attention was drawn this week to another part of Kamnitzer’s paper on MV-polytopes were he discusses clusters of primitive polytopes (observed by Anderson).  Primitive polytopes are a finitie set (for the finite dimensional groups anyway) of polytopes that generate all MV-polytopes under Minkowski sum.  MV-polytopes aren’t closed under Minkowski sum, but the primitive polytopes are grouped into clusters such that taking Minkowski sum within a cluster guarantees an MV-polytope.  Prehaps I should emphasize, every MV-polytope can be written as the Minkowski sum of a set of primitive polytopes found in the same cluster.

The clusters correspond to tropical choices.  When we have a tropical formula A=min\{B,C,D\} this can be rephrased as:

A=B,A\le C,A\le D OR
A=C,A\le D,A\le B OR
A=D,A\le B,A\le C

So the solution set to a tropcal formula is a union of cones.  Each of these cones (generally overlapping) correspond to a tropical choice.   If an MV polytope satisfies the tropical Plucker relations with a particular tropical choice — then it can be generated via Minkowski sum by polytopes in the cluster corresponding to that tropical choice.

I’m very interested in this because for $latex  L\mathfrak{sl}_2$ I don’t have a satisfactory sense of tropical Plucker relations, but I do have a notion of “MV-polytopes” (not yet realized as moment map images of cycles, but functioning combinatorially in the same way) and of course Minkowski sum.   So if I can observe primitives and  clusters, I may gain some insight into what sort of tropical relations to expect.

Leave a Reply